Ex Parte HARDIN et al - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2001-0950                                                        
          Application No. 08/534,855                                                  


               (a) monitoring said communication stream for Temporary                 
          Equipment Identifier (TEI) message blocks, said TEI message                 
          blocks comprising TEI messages and a plurality of Forward Error             
          Correction (FEC)bits;                                                       
               (b) determining a Base Error Rate (BER) by comparing known             
          bits of the communication stream with received bits of the                  
          communication stream; and                                                   
               (c) decoding said FEC bits only when said BER is above a               
          predetermined level.                                                        

                                     References                                       
          The references relied on by the Examiner are as follows:                    
          Dahlin                   5,199,031           Mar. 30, 1993                  
          Stengel et al.           5,265,270           Nov. 23, 1993                  
          (Stengel)                                                                   
                                 Rejections at Issue                                  
               Claims 1, 3, 19, 21, and 28-31 stand rejected under                    
          35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Stengel.                         
               Claims 2, 4-18, 20, and 22-27 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.           
          § 103 as being unpatentable over Dahlin in view of Stengel.                 
               Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellants or the                  
          Examiner, we make reference to the Brief1 and the Answer for the            
          respective details thereof.                                                 



          1Appellants filed an appeal brief on September 21, 2000, Paper              
          No. 20.  In response, the Examiner's Answer, Paper No. 21, was              
          mailed on November 16, 2000.                                                
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007