The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 25 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DANA M. DUFFIELD, RONDA M. HALEY, TIMOTHY L. KRAMER, DANIEL D. SCHULZ, ALLEN M. SCHMIDT, and JAMES S. WILLIAMS ____________ Appeal No. 2001-0962 Application No. 07/687,276 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before KRASS, SCHAFER, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges. CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge. Decision on Appeal This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 to 3, 6 to 11 and 13, which are all of the claims pending in this application. Claims 5 and 12 have been canceled. The appellants’ invention relates to a method and apparatus for remote administration of programmable workstations coupled to a host computer in a data processing system (specification,Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007