Appeal No. 2001-1088 Page 2 Application No. 08/879,140 The appellant's invention relates to a roll that includes a roll tube provided with an outer elastic coating. The sealed interior space may include a vaporizable liquid and a heat exchanger for cooling heat generated in the roll during use (specification, p. 1). A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellant's brief. The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are: Wolfgang DT 24 00 615 A1 July 17, 1975 (Wolfgang '615) Teruhisa JP 58061318 A Apr. 12, 1983 Matsuda JP 58034999 Aug. 1983 Wolgang EP 0 567 875 A1 Nov. 3, 19931 (Wolfgang '875) Claims 1 to 6, 10 to 15, 17, 18 and 20 to 32 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Wolfgang '875 in view of Matsuda. 1In determining the teachings of these four references we will rely on the translations of record in the application file.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007