Ex Parte SMITH JR. - Page 7



          Appeal No. 2001-1094                                                        
          Application 09/237,578                                                      


          the head slider 13 alone would not lead one of ordinary skill in            
          the art to conclude that a piezoelectric sensor would prove                 
          beneficial if positioned on the slider’s front surface of the               
          head.                                                                       
               In conclusion, we find the references fail to disclose,                
          teach or suggest a piezoelectric transducer which projects                  
          outwardly from the slider’s surrounding sidewall to produce an              
          electronic signal in response to the presence of an asperity                
          relative to the slider as recited in claims 1, 9, and 11. Since             
          claims 2-6 and 10 are dependent on independent claims 1, 9, and             















                                          7                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007