Appeal No. 2001-1116 Application No. 09/070,222 The obviousness rejection of claim 2 is reversed because the teachings of Hong1 do not cure the noted shortcomings in the teachings of Chiu and Kobayashi. DECISION The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 through 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is reversed. REVERSED KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT ERROL A. KRASS ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JERRY SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) KWH/lp 1 Hong discloses (Figure 2) an image projection system with a quarter-wave plate 35 or 36 arranged between the reflective portions of a liquid crystalline display 37 or 38 and the polarizing beam splitter 32. Hong, however, lacks a color-separating prism system as set forth in the claims on appeal. 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007