Ex Parte MURPHY et al - Page 5


                Appeal No. 2001-1151                                                                  Page 5                           
                Application No. 08/605,651                                                                                                


                above-noted deficiency, i.e., the improper combination of Murphy and Morehouse.                                           

                Accordingly, we reverse both section 103 rejections on appeal.1                                                           

                        The examiner’s decision is reversed.                                                                              

                                                             REVERSED                                                                     

                                                                                         )                                                
                                        Sherman D. Winters                              )                                                
                                        Administrative Patent Judge                      )                                                
                                                                                         )                                                
                                                                                         )                                                
                                                                                         ) BOARD OF PATENT                                
                                        William F. Smith                                )                                                
                                        Administrative Patent Judge                      )   APPEALS AND                                  
                                                                                         )                                                
                                                                                         ) INTERFERENCES                                  
                                                                                         )                                                
                                        Toni R. Scheiner                                )                                                
                                        Administrative Patent Judge                      )                                                






                ELD                                                                                                                       










                                                                                                                                          
                1 In the text, we have focused attention on independent claim 3 because Murphy discloses every feature                    
                of the subject matter sought to be patented in claim 3 except for one claim limitation.  Independent claims               
                1 and 29 include that same limitation, and differ from Murphy additionally in view of the recitation “wherein             
                at least about 10 weight percent of the encapsulated particles have a core content of both bicarbonate                    
                and fragrance crystallites.”  A fortiori, the section 103 rejection of all claims on appeal must fall in view of          
                the improper combination of Murphy and Morehouse.                                                                         






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007