Appeal No. 2001-1151 Page 5 Application No. 08/605,651 above-noted deficiency, i.e., the improper combination of Murphy and Morehouse. Accordingly, we reverse both section 103 rejections on appeal.1 The examiner’s decision is reversed. REVERSED ) Sherman D. Winters ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT William F. Smith ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) Toni R. Scheiner ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ELD 1 In the text, we have focused attention on independent claim 3 because Murphy discloses every feature of the subject matter sought to be patented in claim 3 except for one claim limitation. Independent claims 1 and 29 include that same limitation, and differ from Murphy additionally in view of the recitation “wherein at least about 10 weight percent of the encapsulated particles have a core content of both bicarbonate and fragrance crystallites.” A fortiori, the section 103 rejection of all claims on appeal must fall in view of the improper combination of Murphy and Morehouse.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007