The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 19 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DANIEL CONZELMANN, KARL-HEINZ SEEFRIED and GUNTER STEPHAN ____________ Appeal No. 2001-1210 Application No. 09/255,990 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before FRANKFORT, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection (Paper No. 12, mailed March 27, 2000) of claims 1 to 12.1 Claims 13 to 37, which are all of the other claims pending in this application, have been withdrawn from consideration. We AFFIRM-IN-PART. 1 Claim 1 was amended subsequent to the final rejection.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007