Ex Parte PARKS et al - Page 1



            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was                                
            not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the                               
            Board.                                                                                        
                                                                          Paper No. 28                    
                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                      
                                              __________                                                  
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                         
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                               
                                              __________                                                  
              Ex parte JOHN C. PARKS, DAVID H KNOEBEL, LAWRENCE M. JENKINS,                               
            GEORGE H. RANSFORD, GARY L. BOWMAN, JR. and SAADAT HUSSAIN                                    
                                              __________                                                  
                                        Appeal No. 2001-1234                                              
                                       Application 08/658,983                                             
                                              ___________                                                 
                                                ON BRIEF                                                  
                                              ___________                                                 
            Before OWENS, KRATZ and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent                                    
            Judges.                                                                                       
            OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                               
                  This appeal is from the refusal to allow claim 50, which was                            
            added after final rejection, and claims 26, 27, 29-34, and 43-48                              
            which depend directly or indirectly therefrom.  These are all of                              
            the claims remaining in the application.                                                      




                                                    1                                                     




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007