The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 40
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ELY VEA and
FRANCOIS COLLIOT
__________
Appeal No. 2001-1251
Application No. 08/369,865
__________
ON BRIEF1
__________
Before WINTERS, ADAMS, and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges.
ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 2-8, which are all the claims pending in the
application.
Claim 2 is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and is reproduced
below:
2. A process for the treatment of grasslands against grasshoppers or
locusts comprising treating the grasslands attacked, or susceptible
to attack, by grasshoppers or locusts with an effective amount of an
active material which is 1-[2,6-dichloro-4-CF3-phenyl]-3-cyano-4-
CF3SO-5NH2-pyrazole].
The references relied upon by the examiner are:
1 In accordance with 37 CFR 1.194(c), the Board decided that an oral hearing was not necessary
in this appeal.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007