The opinion in support of the remand being entered today was not written for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 37 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte SHIGERU FUJITA, NORIMITSU MUKAI, MIHO YAMATO and KEIJI SADAI ____________ Appeal No. 2001-1353 Application No. 08/488,413 ____________ REMANDING TO EXAMINER ________________ An Information Disclosure Statement was filed on May 30, 2001 (Paper No. 36). The application is being returned to the examiner for consideration of the statement submitted and notification to the applicants to indicate if their submission meets the criteria as forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.97 and 1.98. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the application is remanded to the Examiner for such consideration of the Information Disclosure Statement and for such further action as may be appropriate.Page: 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007