Ex Parte ELKINS - Page 11



          Appeal No. 2001-1418                                                        
          Application 08/022,822                                                      

               certain thing may result from a given set of                           
               circumstances is not sufficient. [Citations omitted.]                  
               If, however, the disclosure is sufficient to show that                 
               the natural result flowing from the operation as taught                
               would result in the performance of the questioned                      
               function, it seems to be well settled that the                         
               disclosure should be regarded as sufficient.                           
               Gammons simply does not pass muster under these principles             
          with regard to the inherency issues at hand.                                
               Therefore, we shall not sustain the standing 35 U.S.C.                 
          § 102(b) rejection of claims 39 and 51, and dependent claims 41             
          and 52, as being anticipated by Gammons.                                    
                                      SUMMARY                                         
               The decision of the examiner to reject claims 39 through 41,           
          51 and 52 is reversed.                                                      
                                     REVERSED                                         




                         IRWIN CHARLES COHEN           )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       ) BOARD OF PATENT              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )   APPEALS AND                
                         LAWRENCE J. STAAB             )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   ) INTERFERENCES                
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                          11                                          



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007