The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ROBERT HURWITZ
_____________
Appeal No. 2001-1482
Application 08/879,392
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 2
through 11, 13 through 15 and 18 through 22, which are all of the claims remaining in
this application. Claims 1, 12, 16 and 17 have been canceled. On page 1 of the
supplemental appeal brief (Paper No. 20) appellant has expressly withdrawn the appeal
as to claim 11. Accordingly, the appeal as to claim 11 is dismissed and thus only claims
2 through 10, 13 through 15 and 18 through 22 remain for our consideration on appeal.
Appellant's invention relates to a jewelry assembly in which the appearance of an
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007