The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 30 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte STEVE E. ARMINGTON, RICHARD O. RATZEL, MICHAEL J. LENCOSKI, JAMES A. SIMMONS and DAVID V. MURPHY ____________ Appeal No. 2001-1486 Application No. 09/137,218 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before FRANKFORT, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 135, 141-147, 150-153 and 157, all the claims currently pending in the application. Appellants’ invention pertains a stand for supporting a machine that converts sheet-like stock material into a relatively low density cushioning dunnage product. With reference to drawing Figures 27, 43 and 78, the stand (306) is characterized by a pair of spaced apart feet (308) removably attaching to the stand, with the feet having supports (316) for supporting the ends of a holderPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007