Appeal No. 2001-1489 Page 16 Application No. 09/177,695 appropriate action not inconsistent with the views expressed herein. We emphasize that we vacate examiner’s rejections. This means that the instant rejection no longer exists and the issues set forth herein cannot be satisfied by a Supplemental Examiner’s Answer. See Ex parte Zambrano, 58 USPQ2d 1312, 1313 (Bd. Pat. App. & Int. 2000). VACATED AND REMANDED ) HUBERT C. LORIN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT DONALD E. ADAMS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) ERIC GRIMES ) Administrative Patent Judge ) Unilever Patent Department 45 River Road Edgewater NJ 07020Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16Last modified: November 3, 2007