Appeal No. 2001-1529
Application No. 08/696,627
the rejection deficient in addressing. Since not all limitations of the claims have been
shown as disclosed or suggested by the prior art, we do not sustain the rejection of
claims 1-4, 6, 7, and 9-12 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Hilton and
Judson.
CONCLUSION
The rejection of claims 1-4, 6, 7, and 9-12 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
JOSEPH L. DIXON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
STUART S. LEVY ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP )
Administrative Patent Judge )
-5-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007