The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 14 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte WALLACE LONDON ____________ Appeal No. 2001-1635 Application No. 09/294,873 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, NASE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the refusal of the examiner to allow claims 1, 7 and 10, as 1 amended subsequent to the final rejection. These claims constitute all of the claims pending in this application. While the examiner has approved entry of the amendment after final rejection (Paper No. 7, filed1 May 10, 2000), we note that the amendment to claims 1, 7 and 10 has not been clerically entered.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007