Ex parte RHEAULT et al. - Page 1




                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                
                                     for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                        

                                                                                             Paper No. 25              


                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                   
                                                    ____________                                                       

                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                    
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                     ____________                                                      
                               Ex parte ALAN E. RHEAULT, MARK W. CHAMBERLIN,                                           
                                   SAMUEL J. ELLISON and GEORGE J. SIMONS                                              
                                                     ____________                                                      
                                                 Appeal No. 2001-1636                                                  
                                              Application No. 09/226,890                                               
                                                     ____________                                                      
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                        
                                                     ____________                                                      
              Before ABRAMS, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                          
              NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                       




                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                     
                     This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 to 12, 14            
                                 1                                                                                     
              to 16 and 20 to 23.   Claims 13 and 17 to 19 have been allowed.  No claim has been                       
              canceled.                                                                                                




                     Claim 23 was amended subsequent to the final rejection.1                                                                                                





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007