The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 24 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte BRIAN T. BYRNE __________ Appeal No. 2001-1680 Application 08/890,471 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before WILLIAM SMITH, LIEBERMAN, and POTEATE, Administrative Patent Judges. POTEATE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 14-21 and 28.1 1 1 Claims 1-5, 8-13 and 22-25 are pending but have been withdrawn from consideration as directed to a non-elected invention. Final Rejection, Paper No. 13, mailed January 5, 2000, page 2. Claims 6 and 7 were cancelled (Paper No. 12, received October 19, 1999). Claims 26, 27 and 29 were cancelled in an amendment after final (Paper No. 18, received November 9, 2000), filed with the appeal brief (Paper No. 17, page 2, paragraph (4). See Examiner’s Answer, Paper No. 19, mailed January 11, 2001, page 2, paragraph (4). 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007