The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 29 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte BRIAN J. RICE ____________ Appeal No. 2001-1682 Application No. 08/837,668 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's rejection of claims 1, 4 through 14 and 17 through 22. Claims 2, 3, 15 and 16 have been canceled. As noted on page 1 of the specification, appellant's invention relates to a door security device which mechanically prevents a door from being opened. Of particular importance to appellant in the present application is the use of chemical bonding means to secure the receiving means or attachment blockPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007