Ex Parte HOLT et al - Page 1




         `The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was            
         not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the            
         Board.                                                                     
                                                              Paper No. 12          

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                    __________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                         
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                    __________                                      
                             Ex parte STEVEN ALLEN HOLT,                            
                                ALAN EDWARD SHERRY,                                 
                                        and                                         
                              VERNON SANFORD PING III                               
                                    __________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2001-1712                                
                             Application No. 09/456,968                             
                                    ___________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                      
                                    ___________                                     
         Before OWENS, DELMENDO, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative               
         Patent Judges.                                                             
         DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                     


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                 
              This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                 
         (2002) from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 30 through            
         40, which are all of the claims pending in the above-identified            
         application.                                                               
              The subject matter on appeal relates to a cleaning                    
         implement.  Further details of this appealed subject matter are            






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007