Appeal No. 2001-1760 Application No. 09/259,890 claims drawn to a broader invention than the specific embodiments described in the specification would not violate the enablement requirement of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112. See, e.g., In re Dinh-Nguyen, 492 F.2d 856, 858-59, 181 USPQ 46, 48 (CCPA 1974). In view of the foregoing, the examiner, on this record, has not established a prima facie case of unpatentability under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph. Therefore, we reverse the examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1 through 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph. REVERSED CHUNG K. PAK ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT ROMULO H. DELMENDO ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) MARK NAGUMO ) Administrative Patent Judge ) CKP/lp FELSMAN BRADLEY VADEN GUNTER & DILLON LAKEWOOD ON THE PARK #350 7600 B NORTH CAPITAL OF TEXAS HIGHWAY 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007