The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 22 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ORVILLE C. HUGGINS ____________ Appeal No. 2001-1765 Application No. 09/159,972 ____________ HEARD: JUNE 13, 2002 ____________ Before COHEN, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 9. Subsequent to appeal, appellant canceled claims 6 through 8 (Paper No. 16). Thus, we have before us for review claims 1 through 5 and 9, all of the claims remaining in the application. Appellant’s invention pertains to an apparatus for printing and dispensing labels releasably adhered to a carrier web. A basic understanding of the invention can be derived from aPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007