The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ORVILLE C. HUGGINS
____________
Appeal No. 2001-1765
Application No. 09/159,972
____________
HEARD: JUNE 13, 2002
____________
Before COHEN, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 9. Subsequent to appeal, appellant canceled claims 6
through 8 (Paper No. 16). Thus, we have before us for review
claims 1 through 5 and 9, all of the claims remaining in the
application.
Appellant’s invention pertains to an apparatus for printing
and dispensing labels releasably adhered to a carrier web. A
basic understanding of the invention can be derived from a
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007