Ex parte KITE - Page 10




          Appeal No. 2001-1808                                                        
          Application 08/987,487                                                      


          consistent with the recited objective of identifying plural                 
          “perimeter points.”                                                         
                                      SUMMARY                                         
               The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 through 5              
          is reversed, and a new rejection of claims 1 through 4 is                   
          entered pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b).                                      
               This decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant              
          to 37 CFR § 1.196(b)(amended effective Dec. 1, 1997, by final               
          rule notice, 62 Fed. Reg. 53,131, 53,197 (Oct. 10, 1997), 1203              
          Off. Gaz. Pat. & Trademark Office 63, 122 (Oct. 21, 1997)).                 
          37 CFR § 1.196(b) provides that, “A new ground of rejection                 
          shall not be considered final for purposes of judicial                      
          review.”                                                                    
               37 CFR § 1.196(b) also provides that the appellant,                    
          WITHIN TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise              
          one of the following two options with respect to the new                    
          ground of rejection to avoid termination of proceedings                     
          (§ 1.197(c)) as to the rejected claims:                                     
               (1) Submit an appropriate amendment of the                             
               claims so rejected or a showing of facts relating to                   
               the claims so rejected, or both, and have the matter                   
               reconsidered by the examiner, in which event the                       
               application will be remanded to the examiner. . . .                    

                                          10                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007