The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 19 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte HEINRICH WULFERT and RICHARD A. BEHR __________ Appeal No. 2001-1845 Application 09/093,454 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before FRANKFORT, McQUADE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge. ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING This is in response to appellants’ request for rehearing of our decision mailed March 28, 2002, wherein we affirmed the examiner's rejection of claims 1 through 3, 6 through 13 and 16 through 18 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Pracht (U.S. Patent No. 4,506,482) and the rejection of claim 19 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007