Ex Parte RIEDEL et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2001-1853                                                        
          Application 09/198,217                                                      

               an electromechanical piezoelectret for converting electrical           
          energy into mechanical energy, said piezoelectret being carried             
          on said substrate and having an inner electrode towards said                
          substrate; and                                                              
               an electrically conductive coating between said inner                  
          electrode and said substrate forming an electrical contact at a             
          plurality of locations with said inner electrode, and wherein               
          said conductive coating does not extend to a side of said                   
          substrate opposite from said piezoelectret.                                 
               The following references are relied on by the examiner:                
          Bullock                  4,140,936           Feb. 20, 1979                  
          Stein et al. (Stein)     5,404,067           Apr.  4, 1995                  
               Claims 1-19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As                  
          evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies only upon Bullock in           
          view of Stein.  The examiner's additional reliance in the final             
          rejection upon Bost and Williams in the alternative has been                
          withdrawn as noted at page 5 in the answer.                                 
               Rather than repeat the positions of the appellants and the             
          examiner, reference is made to the briefs and the answer for the            
          respective details thereof.                                                 

                                       OPINION                                        
               Among claims 1, 8, 16 and 17, the only claims for which                
          appellants present arguments in the brief and reply brief, we               
          sustain the rejection only of independent claim 1 and dependent             

                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007