Appeal No. 2001-1863
Application No. 08/603,665
Claims 13 and 16-18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
as being unpatentable over Mizoguchi in view of Morris and
O’Sullivan.
Claims 14 and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
as being unpatentable over Mizoguchi in view of Morris, O’Sullivan
and Braitberg.
Claim 19 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Mizoguchi in view of Morris, O’Sullivan and
Gulick.
Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellant and the
Examiner, we make reference to the brief (paper no. 12), reply
brief (paper no. 16), the final rejection (paper no. 9) and the
answer (paper no. 13) for the respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have considered the rejections advanced by the Examiner and
the supporting arguments. We have, likewise, reviewed the
Appellant's arguments set forth in the briefs.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007