The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 22 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte HIROYUKI YAMASHITA, SHU YAMAGUCHI, TERUO KUBOTA, KATSUHIKO KASAI, SHIGERU TAMURA, and MASAKI TSUMADORI ___________ Appeal No. 2001-1865 Application No.09/068,476 ___________ HEARD: MAY 21, 2002 __________ Before GARRIS, PAWLIKOWSKI and NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judges. PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, and 3 through 49. We note that the examiner has indicated that claims 4 and 40 contain allowable subject matter. (answer, pages 6-7). Hence, claims 1, 3, 5-39, and 41-49 remain on appeal.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007