Appeal No. 2001-1930
Application No. 08/833,719
material which is to be edited, i.e., the source material), and
the digitized sequences of images (the edited material). Thus,
both the source material and the edited material are stored on
the storage medium.
Therefore, we sustain the obviousness rejection of claim 1
and its grouped claims 2, 3 and 5-7 over Norton in view of
Rayner.
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1-3 and 5-7
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007