The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 67
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte MICHAEL J. POWELL,
ANTHONY R. REES,
PAUL M. BOOTH,
HONG WONPYO,
RICHARD C. TITMAS, and
RICHARD J. MASSEY
__________
Appeal No. 2001-19571
Application No. 08/479,849
__________
ON BRIEF2
__________
Before SCHEINER, ADAMS, and MILLS, Administrative Patent Judges.
ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 15-25, which are all the claims pending in the
application.
Claim 15 is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and is reproduced
below:
1 This appeal is related, through at least one common parent application, to Appeal No. 2000-
0893 (Application No. 08/392407), and Appeal No. 2001-1910 (Application No. 08/325,540).
Accordingly, these appeals were considered together.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007