Appeal No. 2001-2021
Application No. 09/206,393
themselves, would have been quite familiar to a person of
ordinary skill in the art.
Hence, the examiner’s 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph,
rejection of claims 28 through 38, whether based on the
written description requirement or the enablement requirement,
or both, is not well founded. Accordingly, we shall not
sustain this rejection.
SUMMARY
The decision of the examiner to reject claims 28 through
38 is reversed.
REVERSED
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007