Appeal No. 2001-2065
Application 09/124,871
small signal receiving area, the number and placement of
sensors for an artisan skilled in the detection arts and [sic]
would necessarily be in the position where such detection
enhancement is needed." These statements clearly indicate
that the Examiner has used Appellant's disclosure against him
because only Appellant has stated where the accuracy problem
occurs. In addition, the Examiner's reasoning regarding
claim 3 does not address the claim language about
substantially equal signal sensing areas.
CONCLUSION
The rejections of claims 1-8 are reversed.
REVERSED
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JERRY SMITH ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
- 13 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007