Ex Parte NELSON et al - Page 1



              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written              
                       for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                     
                                                                              Paper No. 30            
                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                  
                                            ____________                                              
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                     
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                            
                                            ____________                                              
                            Ex parte ERIK NELSON, JEFFREY TEACHOUT,                                   
                                           and LEE SPECHTS                                            
                                            ____________                                              
                                        Appeal No. 2001-2076                                          
                                    Application No. 09/107,057                                        
                                            ____________                                              
                                               ON BRIEF                                               
                                            ____________                                              
           Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                           
           COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                        


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                           

                  This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 2                              
           through 9, 11, 14 through 16, 30 through 39, and 41.  These                                
           claims constitute all of the claims remaining in the application.                          

                  Appellants' invention pertains to a board guide and a                               
           cabinet.  A basic understanding of the invention can be derived                            
           from a reading of exemplary claims 15, 16, 37 and 38, respective                           






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007