The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 30 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ERIK NELSON, JEFFREY TEACHOUT, and LEE SPECHTS ____________ Appeal No. 2001-2076 Application No. 09/107,057 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 2 through 9, 11, 14 through 16, 30 through 39, and 41. These claims constitute all of the claims remaining in the application. Appellants' invention pertains to a board guide and a cabinet. A basic understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claims 15, 16, 37 and 38, respectivePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007