The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RICHARD M. WOLFE
____________
Appeal No. 2001-2112
Application No. 09/327,922
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before FRANKFORT, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 7, 9 through 12, 14, 16 through 18
and 20 through 22.1 On page 6 of the answer (Paper No. 11) the
examiner has indicated that claims 13 and 15, the only other
claims remaining in the application, contain allowable subject
matter. Claims 8 and 19 have been canceled.
1
1 Claim 4 was amended subsequent to the final rejection in a
paper filed October 17, 2000 (Paper No. 6).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007