Ex parte HIRATA - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2001-2192                                                        
          Application 09/116,906                                                      




                                   THE INVENTION                                      
               The invention relates to “a seat with a sheet-like sensor              
          which detects whether an occupant is seated in the seat”                    
          (specification, page 1).  Independent claim 11 reads as                     
          follows:                                                                    
               11.  A seat with a seat sensor, comprising:                            
               a pressure sensitive sheet sensor for sensing a pressure               
          having a terminal and a cable for connecting the sheet sensor               
          and the terminal, and                                                       
               a seat pad for allowing a user to sit thereon, said seat               
          pad having a slit extending horizontally from a rear                        
          peripheral side of the seat pad to a middle area of the seat                
          pad, said slit having a width and a height to allow the sheet               
          sensor to enter from the rear peripheral side to the middle                 
          area thereof so that the sheet sensor is disposed inside the                
          seat pad, and the terminal projects from the rear side of the               
          seat pad.                                                                   
                                   THE PRIOR ART                                      
               The reference relied on by the examiner to support the                 
          final rejection is:                                                         
          Fontaine                   5,120,980                Jun. 9,                 
          1992                                                                        
                                   THE REJECTION                                      
               Claims 11 and 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)               
          as being anticipated by Fontaine.                                           
               Attention is directed to the appellant’s brief (Paper No.              
          14) and the examiner’s answer (Paper No. 15) for the                        
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007