Ex parte JANOUSEK - Page 2




             Appeal No. 2001-2199                                                             Page 2               
             Application No. 08/754,462                                                                            


                                                 BACKGROUND                                                        
                    The appellant's invention relates to packaging for fiber glass rovings (specification,         
             p. 1).  A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellant's brief.      


                    The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                
             appealed claims are:                                                                                  
             PPG Industries, Inc. Packing Specification No. 972.0 & 972.1; Nov. 19, 1992 & Dec. 3,                 
             1992 (PPG '972)                                                                                       
             PPG Industries, Inc. Packing Specification No. 913.0 and five photos; Sept. 2, 1993                   
             (PPG '913)                                                                                            
                                                        1                                                          
             French Patent No. 2,446,238; Aug. 8, 1980  (French '238)                                              



                    Claims 18, 19, 21 to 30 and 33 to 37 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                   
             being unpatentable over PPG '913 in view of French '238.                                              


                    Claims 31 and 32 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                    
             over PPG '913 in view of French '238 as applied to claim 18, and further in view of                   
             PPG '972.                                                                                             


                    In determining the teachings of this reference, we will rely on the translation provided by the1                                                                                             
             USPTO.  A copy of the translation is attached for the appellant's convenience.                        







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007