Ex Parte HENRY - Page 1



          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                            Paper No. 21              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                               Ex parte BARRY J. HENRY                                
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2001-2205                                  
                               Application 09/228,987                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT, and STAAB, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                     
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
          This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                      
          rejection of claims 1 through 7, and from the examiner’s refusal            
          to allow claims 11 and 15 through 17 as amended subsequent to the           
          final rejection in a paper filed March 26, 2001 (Paper No. 12).             
          Claims 8 through 10, the only other claims remaining in the                 
          application, have been withdrawn from consideration by the                  
          examiner as being directed to a non-elected invention.  Claims 12           
          through 14 have been canceled.                                              

                                          1                                           




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007