Appeal No. 2001-2265 Application No. 09/151,934 OPINION We reverse the aforementioned rejection. JP ‘080 discloses a method for making an automotive sunshade panel by using compression molding to bend a hollow aluminum panel such that the panel has a radius of curvature which can be 11,200 mm (pages 8 and 15). Each of the appellants’ independent claims requires that longitudinal edges of the hollow aluminum panel are flanged by press forming or roll forming. The examiner argues that the JP ‘080 stretch part 19 is a flange (answer, pages 5, 7, 9, 12, 13, and 15). Stretch part 19 is an edge portion which is formed during the compression molding, as shown in figure 5, and is then excised (page 15) to form a sunshade panel which, as shown in figure 7, has no portion resembling a flange. The examiner argues that Westaway (page 2, lines 30-36) would have led one of ordinary skill in the art to bend the JP ‘080 sunshade panel by passing it through the nip between concave and convex rollers instead of using compression molding, in order to reduce the cost and improve the retention of curvature (answer, page 7). Using a metal roller in combination with an elastic roller would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, the examiner argues, in view of the appellants’ 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007