The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte VICTOR LUST, STEPHEN ROBERT BEATON,
SCOTT FREDERICK ANSELL, HENRI ARMAND DAGOBERT,
PHILLIP KING PARNELL Sr., CRAIG WILLIAM WALKER
and DANIEL TSU-FANG WANG
__________
Appeal No. 2001-2332
Application 08/909,249
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 29, 30 and 44. Claims 20, 22 and 26, which
are the only other claims remaining in the application, stand
allowed. Claims 1 through 19, 21, 23 through 25, 27, 28 and 31
through 43 have been canceled.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007