Ex Parte LUST et al - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                            Paper No. 33              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
          Ex parte VICTOR LUST, STEPHEN ROBERT BEATON,                                
          SCOTT FREDERICK ANSELL, HENRI ARMAND DAGOBERT,                              
          PHILLIP KING PARNELL Sr., CRAIG WILLIAM WALKER                              
                              and DANIEL TSU-FANG WANG                                
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2001-2332                                  
                               Application 08/909,249                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      

          Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.            
          FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                     


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   


          This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                      
          rejection of claims 29, 30 and 44.  Claims 20, 22 and 26, which             
          are the only other claims remaining in the application, stand               
          allowed.  Claims 1 through 19, 21, 23 through 25, 27, 28 and 31             
          through 43 have been canceled.                                              

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007