Ex Parte POTIER et al - Page 10



          Appeal No. 2001-2354                                                        
          Application No. 09/186,687                                                  

               not sustained the rejection of claim 13 under 35 U.S.C.                
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Goetz in view of Humpolik and           
          Pawlick;                                                                    

               not sustained the rejection of claims 3 and 4 under                    
          35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Goetz in view of              
          Humpolik and Beamer, but has sustained the rejection of claims 16           
          and 17 on the same ground;                                                  

               not sustained the rejection of claims 7 and 18 under                   
          35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Goetz in view of              
          Humpolik and Del Monte; and                                                 

               not sustained the rejection of claim 8 under 35 U.S.C.                 
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Goetz in view of Humpolik,              
          Del Monte, and Scherer.                                                     








                                         10                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007