Appeal No. 2001-2359 Page 4 Application No. 08/161,194 accorded, Blake would not be a proper reference under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) because its filing date would not antedate the effective filing date of the present application. On the basis of the foregoing, we conclude that Blake in not a proper reference against claim 2 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e), and the rejection will not be sustained. SUMMARY The rejection is not sustained. The decision of the examiner is reversed. REVERSED HARRISON E. McCANDLISH ) Senior Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT NEAL E. ABRAMS ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JENNIFER D. BAHR ) Administrative Patent Judge ) NEA:psbPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007