The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 38
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte LAURA G. S. VAN RIJSWIJCK, GRETCHEN LOUISE ELDER, MAURICIO
ROLANDO ODIO, SUSAN BALDWIN and MICHELLE DENISE ROSEMAN
____________
Appeal No. 2001-2366
Application No. 08/926,533
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, ABRAMS, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 7-13,
17 and 23, as amended after the final rejection. Claims 3, 4, 6, 14-16, 18-22, 25, 26
and 28-42 have been withdrawn from consideration as being directed to a non-elected
invention.
WE REVERSE AND ENTER A NEW REJECTION UNDER 37 CFR 1.196(B).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007