The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 34
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KERSTIN JOHANSSON, ROY HANSSON, and ANN SAMUELSSON
____________
Appeal No. 2001-2422
Application No. 08/817,573
____________
HEARD: January 10, 2002
____________
Before FRANKFORT, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 9, which are all of the claims
remaining in this application. Claim 10 has been canceled.1
1Claims 2 and 9 were amended in Paper No. 24, filed July
26, 2000, subsequent to the final rejection. While the
examiner has indicated that this amendment has been approved
for entry, we note that the amendment has not as of yet been
clerically entered. This oversight should be corrected during
any further prosecution of the application before the
examiner.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007