Ex Parte PUCKETT et al - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not        
            written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        
                                                            Paper No. 17              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                  Ex parte RICHARD D. PUCKETT and DAVID J. RAINBOW                    
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 2001-2441                                  
                             Application No. 09/067,923                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    

          Before OWENS, LIEBERMAN, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges             
          OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         


                                      DECISION                                        
               This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 12, 14               
          and 16-18.  Claim 15, which is the only other claim remaining in            
          the application, stands withdrawn from consideration by the                 
          examiner as being directed toward a nonelected invention.                   
                                    THE INVENTION                                     
               The appellants claim a thermal transfer ribbon having a                
          specified thermal transfer layer which, if transferred to a                 



                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007