The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 15 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte RICHARD B. HALSEY ____________ Appeal No. 2001-2457 Application No. 09/168,979 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before PAK, WALTZ, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 21 through 30, which are the only claims remaining in this application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134. According to appellant, the invention is directed to a process for recovering purified cyclopentane from a hydrocarbon stream that contains neo-hexane, hydrocarbon impurities and at least 25 wt. % of cyclopentene (Brief, page 2). Illustrative independent claim 21 is reproduced below:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007