Ex Parte RYU - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2001-2490                                                        
          Application No. 09/388,056                                                  


          the acidic material, with adsorption of at least some part of the           
          reaction products on the acidic material (Brief, pages 2-3).                
          Illustrative independent claim 12 is reproduced below:                      
               12.  A process for the removal of carbonyl compounds                   
          from hydrocarbons comprising feeding a hydrocarbon stream                   
          containing less than 0.1 weight percent carbonyl compounds                  
          comprising at least aldehydes or ketones through a bed of                   
          particulate acidic material at a temperature in the range of 100 to         
          400/C under conditions of pressure and residence time to result in          
          reaction of said carbonyl compounds to produce reaction products            
          and the deposition of said reaction products on said acidic                 
          material.                                                                   
          The examiner has relied upon the following references as                    
          evidence to support the rejections on appeal:                               
          Holiday                      3,453,343          July  1, 1969               
          Hupp et al. (Hupp)           4,117,021          Sep. 26, 1978               
               The claims on appeal stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)           
          as anticipated by or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)          
          as unpatentable over Hupp (Answer, page 3).  Claims 12 and 14 stand         
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Holiday              
          (Answer, page 4).  We reverse the examiner’s rejections on appeal           
          essentially for the reasons stated in the Brief and Reply Brief, as         
          well as the reasons set forth below.                                        






                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007