Ex Parte FLEGO et al - Page 10

               Appeal No. 2001-2491                                                                     Page 10                 
               Application No. 09/168,564                                                                                       


                                                       CONCLUSION                                                               
                      To summarize, the decision of the Examiner to reject claims 1-3, 6, and 7 under the                       
               judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting and claims 1-7 under 35 U.S.C.                  
               § 103(a) is affirmed.                                                                                            
                      No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be                     
               extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).                                                                                
                                                         AFFIRMED                                                               




                                     CHUNG K. PAK                                 )                                             
                                     Administrative Patent Judge                  )                                             
                                                                                  )                                             
                                                                                  )                                             
                                                                                  )                                             
                                                                                  ) BOARD OF PATENT                             
                                     CATHERINE TIMM                               )     APPEALS                                 
                                     Administrative Patent Judge                  )       AND                                   
                                                                                  )  INTERFERENCES                              
                                                                                  )                                             
                                                                                  )                                             
                                                                                  )                                             
                                     JAMES T. MOORE                               )                                             
                                     Administrative Patent Judge                  )                                             
               CT/jg                                                                                                            











Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007