Appeal No. 2001-2509 Application No. 08/603,331 USPQ 275, 277 (CCPA 1976); In re Kuhle, 526 F.2d 553, 556, 188 USPQ 7, 9 (CCPA 1975); In re Marzocchi, 456 F.2d 790, 793, 173 USPQ 228, 229-30 (CCPA 1972); In re Larson, 340 F.2d 965, 969, 144 USPQ 347, 350 (CCPA 1965). In conclusion, based on the foregoing, and the reasons well-stated by the examiner, the examiner's decision rejecting the appealed claims is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED EDWARD C. KIMLIN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT PAUL LIEBERMAN ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) ROMULO DELMENDO ) Administrative Patent Judge ) vsh 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007