Appeal No. 2001-2512
Application No. 09/248,742
In summary,
The examiner’s rejection of claims 8, 9 and 14 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Batie in view of Fanslau is not
sustained.
The examiner’s rejection of claim 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Rettenberger in view of Bradbury is
sustained.
The examiner’s rejection of claims 16 and 19 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Batie in view of Bradbury is
sustained.
The examiner’s rejection of claims 11 and 15 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Batie and Fanslau in view of
Bradbury is not sustained.
The examiner’s rejection of claims 12 and 13 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Batie in view of Fanslau and Amato
is not sustained.
The examiner’s rejection of claims 17 and 18 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Batie in view of Bradbury and
Amato is sustained.
The examiner’s rejection of claims 17 and 18 under 35 U.S.C.
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007