Appeal No. 2001-2516 Page 6 Application No. 09/286,047 We turn next to claim 19 is dependent upon claim 12 we have reviewed the disclosure of Bao and determined that Bao dos not cure the deficiencies noted above for Ray. As such we will not sustain this rejection. The decision of the examiner is reversed. REVERSED NEAL E. ABRAMS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) ) JENNIFER D. BAHR ) Administrative Patent Judge )Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007