The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 57 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DAVID T. GREEN, HENRY BOLANDS, SALVATORE CASTRO, HENRY SIENKIEWICZ, STEPHAN A. DeFONZO, DOUGLAS J. CUNY, and WAYNE P. YOUNG ____________ Appeal No. 2001-2563 Application No. 08/814,757 ____________ ON BRIEF1 ____________ Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 12 through 14, 17, 18, 26, 35, 48, 51, 54 through 56, 72, and 73. These claims constitute all of the claims remaining in the application. 1 Attendance at the hearing set for Tuesday, January 15, 2002 was waived by appellants (Paper No. 54).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007